Tuesday, March 30, 2010
option 1
Option one is the modest heeled gladiator lace-up. It's sort of fun--J has been mocking me endlessly for beginning to use the word "fun" as it relates to fashion--if a little baggie in the ankle. They're comfortable and sorta, kinda bridal, I think. But the fit issue in the ankle may be a problem. J claims that they hide one of my best parts, my ankles. But what does he know about podiatric fashion?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
okay so far I like option 1. no on option 2.
i disagree, maura. i'm not a fan of option 1 because of the ankle issues. option 2 is very pretty, but it's hard to tell if it's appropriate without seeing them with your dress. they do look pretty casual to me.
hmmm. okay. option 1 looks great straight on... just okay from the side. and re: josh's point... if you have good ankles, I say flaunt them. but I am thinking def. no on option 2... too casual. unless the dress is too. but you know what a fashion expert I am. :)
I like them both. However, if you're self-conscious about your feet, I'd go with option 1, which gives the nosy viewer all kinds of things to focus on besides your foot. Plus this shoe is all edgy.
And maybe it's just me, but I've had a slew of #2-type shoes, and while they are comfy at first, they have a tendency to do that "THWACK! THWACK!" thing every time you walk which irritates the stuffing out of me.
--kristina
Post a Comment